On a recent visit to Cannes, I found myself in conversation with an Ed Psych. Naturally, conversation drifted from the weather and supercars to Self Determination Theory.
In short, SDT refers to the concept that intrinsic motivation comes out of a sense of Autonomy, Relatedness and Competence. Without these elements, the success of an individual’s activity will have to rely on external motivational factors, which, of course, are pretty unreliable. Autonomy = Feeling a sense of ownership and choice over your actions Relatedness = Feeling connected to an environment/ situation Competence = Feeling able to do something This got me to thinking. From a pedagogic standing, Self Determination is the holy grail of effective teaching. We want and need our students to be intrinsically motivated and competent enough to meet unforeseen hurdles (like exams, or new tasks, or… life) and try to facilitate learning that will meet this aim. Unfortunately, pressures to demonstrate continued progress and perform according to extrinsic targets means that we can quickly lose sight of this core need. Immediately, I started to consider how SDT might apply to curriculum design. My first scribblings were as follows:
which I turned into this:
My aim here was to strip a curriculum down to to its bare essentials, based on Self Determination Theory.
Autonomy – Students need an element of choice otherwise the learning experience is passive. The PBL process can be an effective context for skills to be applied, and constant reflection and self-critique will encourage a sense of ownership over learning.
Relatedness – All of the best teachers I have worked with have developed a contract (often unspoken) with their students whereby expectations are clear and relationships are balanced. This relatedness to environment is crucial for learning to flourish.
Competence – If you don’t feel able to do something, you won’t intrinsically want to do it. Curricula must offer a sense of competence to all students, and this is where thoughtful differentiation is important.
Next step :what is the role of the teacher in all of this?
Another mad scientist sketch, which I subsequently realised into this:
Simple design. The crossover sections between SDT components led to some fairly obvious conclusions as to what a curriculum should look like, with the Teacher’s role distilled to:
- Designer – of resources, curricula and learning experiences
- Mentor – of students
- Facilitator – of learning
I have introduced this model to my department and it instantly focussed our conversations on curriculum design into something more essential than simply crowbarring skills into content. Furthermore, we could map the whole Key Stage 3 curriculum with a clear understanding of what we are trying to achieve, at a core level.
How might you use this approach in your own curricula? Would be very interested to find out – drop me a comment.
As ever, yours, in teaching,